| 000 | 01953nam a22002057a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20240305110528.0 | ||
| 008 | 240305b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0195-6744 | ||
| 100 | _aUhrich, Benjamin B. | Rogelberg, Sandra L. | Rogelberg, Steven G. | ||
| 245 |
_aThe Power of the Inner Voice _b: Examining Self-Talk’s Relationship with Academic Outcomes (Journal Article) |
||
| 260 |
_aChicago _b: University of Chicago Press _c, May 2022 |
||
| 300 | _a31-60p. | ||
| 440 |
_aAmerican Journal of Education _v, Volume 128: Number 3, May 2022 |
||
| 505 | _a***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________*** | ||
| 520 | _aAbstract: Purpose: People use self-talk (verbalized cognitions) to monitor and evaluate their performance, making it a vital construct in the self-regulation process. Research Methods/Approach: We coded 1,092 self-talk responses from 177 undergraduates for two types of self-talks, constructive and dysfunctional. Findings: We found constructive self-talk positively related to satisfaction, self-efficacy, and academic performance, whereas dysfunctional self-talk negatively related to satisfaction and self-efficacy but was not significantly related to performance. Constructive self-talk explained incremental variance in self-efficacy and performance beyond that explained by related psychological constructs: self-regulation skills, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. Dysfunctional self-talk only explained incremental variance in self-efficacy. Implications: This study shows that self-talk is a unique and influential construct that should be of interest to academics and practitioners across the disciplines of psychology and education. | ||
| 650 | _aInner Voice| Self Help| Self Talk Relationship| Psychological constructs | ||
| 700 | _aKello, John E. | Williams, Eleanor B. | Gur, Shahar S. | Caudill, Leann E. | Moffit, Miles | ||
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1086/727006 | ||
| 942 | _cPER | ||
| 999 |
_c45516 _d45515 |
||