000 02272nam a22002057a 4500
005 20231229165113.0
008 231228b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a0022-0175
100 _aDuval, Philippe Eon
245 _aDivergent and Convergent Thinking across the Schoolyears
_b: A Dynamic Perspective on Creativity Development (Journal Article)
260 _aHoboken,NJ
_b: Wiley Subscription Services Inc.
_c, 2022
300 _a186-198p.
440 _aThe Journal of Creative Behaviour
_v, Volume 57: Number 2, Second Quarter 2023
505 _a***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***
520 _aAbstract: Creative thinking is critical to overcome many daily life situations. As such, there has been a growing interest on how creative thinking develops during childhood. However, little is known about the underlying mechanisms driving its development. Indeed, almost all research has focused on divergent thinking, leaving aside convergent thinking, and did not thoroughly investigate how internal and/or external factors influence their development. Here, 222 children aged from 4 to 12 years old attending either a Montessori or a traditional school performed drawing-based convergent and divergent standardized tasks. In addition, a subset of 41 children were tested using similar tasks for a second session 3 years apart. The results revealed dynamic developmental stages of convergent and divergent thinking. More specifically, a loss of divergent thinking was counterbalanced by a gain of convergent thinking, especially during the fourth-grade slump (8–10 years old). Although Montessori-schooled children showed overall higher creative abilities than traditionally schooled children, no differences were observed in the developmental trajectories of convergent and divergent thinking between the two pedagogies. This suggests that progress and decrease in creative thinking may be mostly due to internal factors such as brain maturation factors than external factors such as peer pressure.
650 _aCreativity Development| Divergent Thinking| Convergent Thinking-Education| Montessori
700 _aFrick, Aurélien | Denervaud, Solange
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.569
942 _cPER
999 _c45014
_d45013