000 02227nam a22002657a 4500
005 20231030112046.0
008 231030b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a0021-9584
037 _bRIEBPL Library
082 _a540.7
100 _a Ryan L. Stowe and Brian J. Esselman
245 _a The Picture Is Not the Point: Toward Using Representations as Models for Making Sense of Phenomena
_b(Journal Article)
_c
260 _aWashington, United States
_b:American Chemical Society
_c,January 10, 2023
300 _a 15-21 p.
490 _aAmerican Chemical Society, Volume 100, Issue 1
505 _a***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***
520 _aAbstract- Organic chemistry students are routinely bombarded with an array of specialized representations (e.g., electron-pushing mechanisms, Newman projections, chair conformations). For practicing chemists, the purpose of representing aspects of a system is to enable prediction or explanation of phenomena. For students, the purpose of drawing and translating between representations is often much less clear. Commonly, “draw the thing” is treated as the end-goal of instruction and assessment. We agree with a chorus of science education scholars that learning science should not be materially different from doing science. With respect to representations, that means that students should use representations for the purpose of attending to and visualizing the components of a system salient to a productive explanation or prediction. Here, we encourage the community to reflect on how and why representations are integrated into their organic chemistry courses. Are drawing and translating between representations treated as ends unto themselves, or are they part of an ensemble of activities directed at understanding why phenomena unfold as they do? We are hopeful that the conversations this commentary provokes help us move toward using representations as models for sensemaking.
650 _aAmides,
650 _aEnergy,
650 _aOrganic chemistry,
650 _aStudents,
650 _aTesting and assessment
856 _u https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00464
942 _cPER
999 _c44644
_d44643