a

Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Perceived Abilities and Declarative Knowledge on Some Basic Aspects and Concepts of Spectroscopy (Journal Article)

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Journal of Chemical Education ; Volume 100, 2023 - Issue 11, November 2023Publication details: Washington DC :American Chemical Society ,2023Description: 4181–4189pISSN:
  • 0021-9584
Subject(s): Online resources:
Contents:
***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***
Summary: Abstract: Spectroscopic methods of molecular structure identification and analysis constitute part of inorganic, organic, analytical, and physical chemistry in both undergraduate and postgraduate chemistry curricula. Despite the importance and complexity of the relevant concepts, it is only recently that studies on spectroscopy have started to appear in the education literature. These studies have focused on student interpretation of spectra. The purpose of this study was to deal with further fundamental issues underlying spectroscopy. We first present students’ perceptions of their knowledge about various aspects of spectroscopy such as the extent of their understanding of the basic concepts of UV, IR, NMR, and MS. In addition, we probed students’ declarative knowledge about basic concepts and features of spectroscopy. The results showed that mass spectrometry was perceived to be the least understood method, while IR was perceived to be the best understood. Students considered their ability to identify the spectroscopic method used for obtaining a spectrum to be relatively satisfactory, as also was, but to a lesser extent, their ability to extract information from the spectrum. Students rated their understanding of the differences among the four spectroscopic methods as moderate. Concerning students’ declarative knowledge about basic concepts and features of spectroscopy, such as the physical meaning of “wavenumber” in IR spectroscopy and of “part per million” in NMR spectroscopy, “performing integration”, and the “resolving power” of a spectrometer, the results were mostly poor. Interestingly, a clear difference was observed between performance on questions at high versus basic levels of declarative knowledge.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periodicals Periodicals RIE BPL Library Not for loan

***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***

Abstract: Spectroscopic methods of molecular structure identification and analysis constitute part of inorganic, organic, analytical, and physical chemistry in both undergraduate and postgraduate chemistry curricula. Despite the importance and complexity of the relevant concepts, it is only recently that studies on spectroscopy have started to appear in the education literature. These studies have focused on student interpretation of spectra. The purpose of this study was to deal with further fundamental issues underlying spectroscopy. We first present students’ perceptions of their knowledge about various aspects of spectroscopy such as the extent of their understanding of the basic concepts of UV, IR, NMR, and MS. In addition, we probed students’ declarative knowledge about basic concepts and features of spectroscopy. The results showed that mass spectrometry was perceived to be the least understood method, while IR was perceived to be the best understood. Students considered their ability to identify the spectroscopic method used for obtaining a spectrum to be relatively satisfactory, as also was, but to a lesser extent, their ability to extract information from the spectrum. Students rated their understanding of the differences among the four spectroscopic methods as moderate. Concerning students’ declarative knowledge about basic concepts and features of spectroscopy, such as the physical meaning of “wavenumber” in IR spectroscopy and of “part per million” in NMR spectroscopy, “performing integration”, and the “resolving power” of a spectrometer, the results were mostly poor. Interestingly, a clear difference was observed between performance on questions at high versus basic levels of declarative knowledge.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Find us on the map

Contact Us

RIE Bhopal
Shyamla Hills
Bhopal
Madhya pradesh - 46003.
E-mail: library.riebpl@gmail.com
Phone: + 91 (0) 755 2522003

Powered by Koha