<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Beyond Convenience: A Case and Method for Purposive Sampling in Chemistry Teacher Professional Development Research</title>
    <subTitle>A Case and Method for Purposive Sampling in Chemistry Teacher Professional Development Research (Journal Article)</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>KatieMarie Q. MagnoneEllen J. Yezierski*</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">USA</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>:American Chemical Society</publisher>
    <dateIssued>,March 2024</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>718–726p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Abstract-

When designing a study, the sampling method for selecting research participants is an important decision with a host of considerations. When designing a professional development (PD) program with a limited number of spaces, the method of choosing participants from the applicants is also important. When research and professional development are entwined, sets of sampling criteria could conflict. Additionally, in a mixed methods study, such as the one undertaken by the researchers, additional trade-offs exist when considering the many potential methods of sampling and participant selection. In this report, we present a novel solution to the problem of multiple-criterion-focused selection of research and PD participants when the number of applicants to participate outnumbers the availability of resources. By using a weighted ranking system, we were able to incorporate multiple purposive sampling criteria in a simultaneous, rather than sequential, fashion. This allowed us to focus our evaluation of chemistry-specific free-response questions on a narrower pool of finalists and more consistently rate their responses. This multipurposive sampling method and a novel tool developed herein have broad implications for both sampling for chemistry education research and participant selection in professional development.
</abstract>
  <tableOfContents>***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***</tableOfContents>
  <subject>
    <topic>Upper-Division Undergraduate</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Introductory Chemistry</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic> Continuing Education</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Chemistry Education Research</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Multimedia-Based Learning</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">540.7</classification>
  <identifier type="issn">0021-9584</identifier>
  <identifier type="stock number">RIEBPL Library</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00217#</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00217#</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">241226</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20241226163417.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
