<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02145nam a22002057a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20240530104719.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240530b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0021-9584</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bunnell, Broden </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Specifications-Based Grading Facilitates Student&#x2013;Instructor Interactions in a Flipped-Format General Chemistry II Course  </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">(Journal Article)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Washington DC </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">:American Chemical Society </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">,2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">4318&#x2013;4326p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="440" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Journal of Chemical Education  </subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Volume 100, 2023 - Issue 11, November 2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract: General chemistry II is often a challenging course for first-year STEM students, and many students rely on partial credit to achieve success in the course. However, assigning liberal partial credit to students&#x2019; work can also disincentivize developing proficiency with the material. Here, we present an alternative specifications-based grading scheme for a general chemistry II lecture delivered as a flipped class. Students evaluated with a specifications-based grading scheme had higher average end-of-semester grades, with a greater proportion of students receiving A&#x2019;s and A&#x2013;&#x2019;s than the students in the traditional grading scheme. Performance on standardized ACS final exams decreased slightly in courses using specifications-based grading. Additionally, we present the results of end-of-semester surveys, which revealed that students under the specifications-based grading system agreed more with positive statements related to student-instructor interactions, including getting feedback and asking for help. These results suggest that specifications-based grading may lead to more positive outcomes in the course and may encourage students to interact with their instructor more often.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">First-Year Undergraduate/General| Curriculum| Collaborative/Cooperative Learning| Student-Centered Learning</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LeBourgeois, Lauren | Doble, James | Gute, Brian | Wainmanat,  Jacob W.    </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00473</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-05-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-05-30 10:47:30</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2024-05-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">45948</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">45947</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
