<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01706nam a22002057a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20240508125012.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240508b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0022-0671  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Henschel, Sofie </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Structure and associations of science vocabulary, general academic vocabulary, and science knowledge</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">(Journal Article)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">USA </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">: Taylor and Francis Group </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">,2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">356-370p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="440" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Journal of Educational Research  </subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Volume 116, 2023 - Issue 6, 2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract: We examined the structure of domain-specific academic science vocabulary, general academic vocabulary, and conceptual science knowledge and their impact on each other across two measurement points in a sample of 388 German third graders. Results show that the three constructs can be empirically differentiated. The high latent correlation between science vocabulary and general academic vocabulary suggests that science vocabulary is a language-related rather than a knowledge-related construct. Furthermore, science knowledge and science vocabulary predicted each other. By contrast, general academic vocabulary was only associated with science vocabulary but not with science knowledge acquisition. Neither science knowledge nor science vocabulary predicted general academic vocabulary at the end of the school year, suggesting it might be less sensitive to regular instruction.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Academic language| elementary school| science competence| vocabulary</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Heppt, Birgit | Hardy, Ilonca </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2023.2269545</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-05-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-05-08 12:50:24</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2024-05-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">45831</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">45830</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
