<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>The Development of a Standardized Effect Size for the SIBTEST Procedure</title>
    <subTitle>(Journal Article)</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Weese, James D.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Turner, Ronna C. | Ames, Allison | Liang, Xinya | Crawford, Brandon</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Philadelphia, USA</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>: Taylor and Francis Group and Routledge</publisher>
    <dateIssued>,March 2024</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>206-224p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Abstract: In this study a standardized effect size was created for use with the SIBTEST procedure. Using this standardized effect size, a single set of heuristics was developed that are appropriate for data fitting different item response models (e.g., 2-parameter logistic, 3-parameter logistic). The standardized effect size rescales the raw beta-uni value using a pooled variation that incorporates the beta-uni inclusion factor. Although the heuristics for the standardized and unstandardized effect sizes provide similar true-positive and false-positive rates in most conditions, the standardized effect size provides higher true-positive rates for conditions where item response variability is smaller in proportion to raw score differences. Inflated false-positive rates were solely impacted by smaller sample sizes, whereas larger sample sizes improved true-positive rates. An empirical application is provided to demonstrate how the standardized effect size provides for a more consistent comparison across items with varying response distributions. This study lays the foundation for the utilization of a standardized effect size for both dichotomous and polytomous item response models using the suite of SIBTEST procedures.</abstract>
  <note>***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***

</note>
  <subject>
    <topic> DIF| differential item functioning| SIBTEST| standardized effect size</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>The Journal of Experimental Education   Volume 92: Number 1, 2024</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">0022-0973  </identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2022.2141176</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2022.2141176</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">240508</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20240508065242.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
