<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01701nam a22002057a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20240508065036.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240508b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0022-0973  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Wheeler, Jordan M. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Using Topic Models to Understand Rater-Mediated Writing Assessments  </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">(Journal Article)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Philadelphia, USA </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">: Taylor and Francis Group and Routledge </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">,March 2024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">186-205p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="440" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Journal of Experimental Education  </subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Volume 92: Number 1, 2024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract: Integrated writing assessments are tasks that require students to construct an essay using evidence from source texts. Topic models are statistical models used to analyze text. This study analyzes two integrated writing tasks from students in grades 6 (N=1,250) and 8 (N=1,250) using topic models. Independent evaluations of the essays were also conducted to help generalize the results across the two grades and better understand students' underlying writing techniques. Four main categories were identified: (1) use of words that appeared in the prompt, (2) words that appeared in the source texts, (3) words that reflected inference, and (4) words that reflected integration. Higher-scoring students used words that reflect inference and integration of source text more often than lower-performing students.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Integrated writing assessments| latent Dirichlet allocation| rater-mediated assessments| topic models</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Raczynski, Kevin R. | Cohen, Allan S. | Engelhard Jr., George </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2022.2130129</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-05-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-05-08 06:50:51</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2024-05-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">45748</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">45747</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
