<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>The Power of the Inner Voice</title>
    <subTitle>: Examining Self-Talk’s Relationship with Academic Outcomes (Journal Article)</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Uhrich, Benjamin B. | Rogelberg, Sandra L. | Rogelberg, Steven G.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Kello, John E. | Williams, Eleanor B. | Gur, Shahar S. | Caudill, Leann E. | Moffit, Miles</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Chicago</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>: University of Chicago Press</publisher>
    <dateIssued>, May 2022</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>31-60p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Abstract: Purpose: People use self-talk (verbalized cognitions) to monitor and evaluate their performance, making it a vital construct in the self-regulation process. Research Methods/Approach: We coded 1,092 self-talk responses from 177 undergraduates for two types of self-talks, constructive and dysfunctional. Findings: We found constructive self-talk positively related to satisfaction, self-efficacy, and academic performance, whereas dysfunctional self-talk negatively related to satisfaction and self-efficacy but was not significantly related to performance. Constructive self-talk explained incremental variance in self-efficacy and performance beyond that explained by related psychological constructs: self-regulation skills, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. Dysfunctional self-talk only explained incremental variance in self-efficacy. Implications: This study shows that self-talk is a unique and influential construct that should be of interest to academics and practitioners across the disciplines of psychology and education.</abstract>
  <tableOfContents>***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***


</tableOfContents>
  <subject>
    <topic>Inner Voice| Self Help| Self Talk Relationship| Psychological constructs</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>American Journal of Education  , Volume 128: Number 3, May 2022</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">0195-6744</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">https://doi.org/10.1086/727006</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://doi.org/10.1086/727006</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">240305</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20240305110528.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
