<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Dissociation Must Be Taken into Account in Raoult’s Law</title>
    <subTitle>(Journal Article)</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Gómez-Siurana, Amparo</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Menargues, Sergio</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Washington DC</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>: American Chemical Society</publisher>
    <dateIssued>, 2023</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>4106–4108p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Abstract: This communication shows that although some textbooks do not discuss how to apply Raoult’s law to electrolyte solutions, we should not ignore dissociation, and the van’t Hoff factor must be considered.</abstract>
  <tableOfContents>***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***

</tableOfContents>
  <subject>
    <topic>Introductory Chemistry| Misconceptions| Solution| Raoult’s Law| Electrolytes</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Journal of Chemical Society  , Volume 100: Number 10, October 2023</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">0021-9584</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00369</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00369</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">240116</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20240117161457.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
