<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02281nam a22002057a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231229174043.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">231228b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0022-0175</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Maliakkal, Nadine T.  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Effects of Leader Support for Creativity and Leader Gender on Subordinate Creative Problem-Solving Performance (Journal Article)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hoboken,NJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">: Wiley Subscription Services Inc. </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">, 2022</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">109-126p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="440" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Journal of Creative Behaviour   </subfield>
    <subfield code="v">, Volume 57: Number 1, First Quarter 2023 </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract: Ample correlational research shows that leader support for creativity is related to subordinate creativity, yet research examining the causality of this relationship experimentally is scant. Furthermore, most studies that demonstrate support for this relationship have used relatively subjective creativity measures that do not tap as effectively into the creative problem-solving process. Thus, we experimentally examined whether leader support for creativity affects subordinate creative problem-solving performance. We also examined whether this relationship depends on leader gender. We used experimental vignette methodology and a sample of 247 working adults to test these relationships. We found that high (vs. low) leader support for creativity resulted in a significantly higher number of ideas generated. Additionally, posthoc analyses showed that high (vs. low) leader support for creativity resulted in a significantly higher number of original ideas and higher number of quality ideas generated. We also found that when the leader was a woman (vs. man), average originality of ideas was significantly higher. We found no significant interactive effects of leader support for creativity and leader gender. We discuss how this study further elucidates our understanding of leader support for creativity, as well as avenues for future creativity research involving leader gender.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Creative Problem Solving Performance| Leader Support for Creativity| Leader Gender| Experimental Vignette Methodology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Reiter-Palmon, Roni </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.566</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-12-29</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-12-29 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-12-29</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">45030</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">45029</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
