02109nam a22002057a 4500 20231229165351.0 231228b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d 0022-0175 Hunter, Samuel T. Why we Support some Original Ideas but Reject Others : An Application of Signaling Theory (Journal Article) Hoboken,NJ : Wiley Subscription Services Inc. , 2022 199-220p. The Journal of Creative Behaviour , Volume 57: Number 2, Second Quarter 2023 ***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________*** Abstract: Although organizations say new ideas are desirable, investing in original products rather than the “tried and true” can be unsettling for decision-makers. This discomfort may be due, in part, to uncertainty surrounding whether a new idea will prove successful. As such, the originality of a creative idea can be paradoxically viewed both as an asset, driving up appeal, as well as a detrimental risk. To help unpack these relationships, we propose that how an original idea is proposed (i.e., pitched) plays a central role in the support it receives. Guided by signaling theory we examined how pitch quality relates to funding for ideas with varying degrees of originality. In a field sample of 245 Kickstarter crowdfunding campaigns, pitch quality for ideas high in originality predicted investment in such ideas. In a follow-up experimental study, we created high- and low-quality pitches for two products, also varying product originality and product quality. Results highlight the importance of high-quality pitches for highly original ideas that are associated with reductions in uncertainty. Supplemental analyses suggest that high-quality pitches improve enthusiasm for a product as well, highlighting a potential second path of support influence. Pitch| Signaling| Pitch Quality| Product| Bias against Creativity Blocker, Lily D. | Gutworth, Melissa B. | Allen, Julian https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.570 PER 0 0 0 0 RIEBPL RIEBPL 2023-12-29 0 2023-12-29 00:00:00 2023-12-29 PER 45015 45014