<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title> Brief Research Report: Psychometric Properties of a Cognitive Load Measure When Assessing the Load Associated With a Course</title>
    <subTitle>(Journal Article)</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Dan J. Miller et al...</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">USA</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>:Taylor and Francis Group and Routledge</publisher>
    <dateIssued>,March 2023</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>401-410 p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Abstract-

 The cognitive load imposed by instruction is an important consideration for instructional designers. Theoretical models have traditionally divided total cognitive load into intrinsic, extrinsic, and germane load. The 10-item Cognitive Load Inventory (CLI-10) is designed to measure these three types of cognitive load. It is typically administered immediately following a discrete learning activity (e.g., a lecture). This study assesses the properties of the CLI-10 when used to measure the “long-term” cognitive load experienced in a course, over a semester. To do this, the instrument was given to a group of students enrolled in a veterinary anatomy course (N = 94), toward the end of a 13-week semester. Students were asked to indicate the cognitive load they experienced across this course. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the instrument’s three-factor structure when used in this way. Further, the instrument’s three subscales performed well in terms of internal reliability and convergent and discriminant validity.














</abstract>
  <tableOfContents>***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***</tableOfContents>
  <subject>
    <topic> Cognitive processes/development</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>factor analysis</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>higher education</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>instructional design/development</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>metacognition</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">370.5 	</classification>
  <identifier type="issn">0022-0973</identifier>
  <identifier type="stock number">RIEBPL Library </identifier>
  <identifier type="uri"> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00220973.2021.1947763?needAccess=true</identifier>
  <location>
    <url> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00220973.2021.1947763?needAccess=true</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">231106</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20231107171524.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
