<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01756nam a22002777a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231107153403.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">231106b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0022-0973</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL Library </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">370.5 	</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Burcu Atar, Kubra Atalay Kabasakal &amp; Nermin Kibrislioglu Uysal</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Comparability of TIMSS 2015 Mathematics Test Scores Across Country Subgroups</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">(Journal Article)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">USA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">:Taylor and Francis Group and Routledge</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">,March 2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">82-100 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Journal of Experimental Education, Volume 91,2023 number 1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract-

 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the population invariance of equating functions across country subgroups in TIMSS 2015 mathematics tests in relation to the raw-score distribution, DIF, and DTF. We used equipercentile and IRT observed-score equating methods. The results of the study indicate that there is a relationship between the population invariance and raw-score and skewness differences for both equating methods. The association between the population invariance and the number of DIF items is explicit in the equipercentile equating but not clear in the IRT equating. Furthermore, we have observed that when the number of DIF items is high, if the DTF value is relatively low, the equating errors tend to be moderate to low.





</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> TIMSS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Equating invariance</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">equipercentile equating</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">IRT observed-score equating</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DTF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00220973.2021.1913978?needAccess=true</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-11-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">370.5 	</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-11-07 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-11-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">44773</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">44772</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
