<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02133nam a22002657a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231107153013.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">231106b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0022-0973</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL Library </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">370.5 	</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sanaz Nazari, Walter L. Leite &amp; A. Corinne Huggins-Manley </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> A comparison between the piecewise and parallel-process piecewise latent growth models</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">(Journal Article)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">USA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">:Taylor and Francis Group and Routledge</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">,March 2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> 62-81 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Journal of Experimental Education, Volume 91,2023 number 1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract-

 The piecewise latent growth models (PWLGMs) can be used to study changes in the growth trajectory of an outcome due to an event or condition, such as exposure to an intervention. When there are multiple outcomes of interest, a researcher may choose to fit a series of PWLGMs or a single parallel-process PWLGM. A comparison of these models is provided with an illustrative example using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010-11 (ECLS-K:2011), and a Monte Carlo simulation study. Conditions manipulated included sample size, location of the transition point, the number of time points, and covariate effect size. The results showed that the power to test parameter estimates with both models depended on the two-way interaction of sample size and covariate effect, and the three-way interaction of sample size by the number of time points by transition point location. Parameter coverage also depended on the three-way interaction of sample size by the number of time points by the transition point location. Recommendations for the use of the PWLGM are provided.




</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">coverage</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">parallel-process piecewise latent growth model</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">piecewise latent growth model</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">power analysis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Type I error rates</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00220973.2021.1993772?needAccess=true</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-11-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">370.5 	</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-11-07 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-11-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">44772</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">44771</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
