<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02349nam a22002537a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231030113433.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">231030b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0021-9584</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL Library</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">540.7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Xiaoyang Gong et al...</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Unpacking Chemistry Teachers&#x2019; Pedagogical Reasoning and Decisions for a PhET Simulation: A TPACK Perspective</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">(Journal Article) </subfield>
    <subfield code="c"> </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Washington, United States</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">:American Chemical Society</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">,January 10, 2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> 34&#x2013;44p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">American Chemical Society, Volume 100, Issue 1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract-

 Computer simulations hold great potential for enhancing chemistry instruction. However, effectively integrating simulations in instruction depends in part on teachers&#x2019; pedagogical reasoning about simulation affordances and instructional decisions within specific classroom contexts. The objective of this study was to investigate how two chemistry teachers evaluated an interactive simulation and determined pedagogical strategies for integrating the simulation into classroom instruction. Based on the TPACK framework, authors adopted a comparative case study approach to interpret qualitative data from three sources: screen-capture videos, interviews, and instructional plans. Results showed that pedagogical reasoning and decisions of the two participants reflected different TPACK components. One teacher mainly utilized TCK and evaluated the simulation from a designer&#x2019;s perspective while the other teacher leveraged TPACK and reasoned from a learner&#x2019;s perspective. The two teachers&#x2019; reasoning processes further shaped their decisions about how to integrate the simulation in instruction, which displayed TPK and TPACK. One teacher intended to provide students with careful guidance by constraining system variables while the other favored more open-ended exploration. Results suggest that teacher knowledge, pedagogical reasoning, and decisions are closely intertwined, which provide implications for future research.






</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Collisions,</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Computer simulations,</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Equilibrium</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">,Molecules,Students</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"> https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00397</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-10-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">540.7</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-10-30 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-10-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">44646</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">44645</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
