<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01314nam a22002537a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231030110534.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">231030b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0021-9584</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL Library</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">540.7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Miguel Reina, Herv&#xE9; This, and Antonio Reina</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Reply to &#x201C;Using the Right Words in the Right Way: Atom, Molecule, Element, and Compound&#x201D;</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">(Journal Article) </subfield>
    <subfield code="c"> </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Washington, United States</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">:American Chemical Society</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">,January 10, 2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> 7-9  p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">American Chemical Society, Volume 100, Issue 1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract-

 A recent article in this Journal suggests a novel definition of molecule, proposes to derive the concept of atom from that of molecule, and offers a revision of the term element. This commentary criticizes specific aspects of the novel proposals in that paper and argues that the terms atom, molecule, element, and compound as currently understood are philosophically adequate and pedagogically appropriate.


</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chemical bonding,</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Elements,</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gold,Molecules</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">,Students</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00946</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIEBPL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-10-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">540.7</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-10-30 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-10-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">44642</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">44641</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
