a

Effects of Seating Arrangement on Students' Interaction in Group Reflective Practice (Journal Article)

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: The Journal of Experimental Education, Volume 91,2023 number 2Publication details: USA :Taylor and Francis Group and Routledge ,March 2023Description: 249-277 pISSN:
  • 0022-0973
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 370.5
Online resources:
Contents:
***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***
Summary: Abstract- In the conducted field experiment, we explore the intensity of university students' interaction related to the seating arrangement (circle or rows) in pre-service teachers' groups during the reflective practice. We also probe the differences across the various fields of study and evaluate the facilitator's influence on the interaction. We use wearable electronic Sociometric badges 2.0 to measure the interaction intensity (assessed by speech rate and average speaking segment length). We performed a total of 153 repeated measurements on 58 students in 4 different fields of study (Mathematics, Physics, Music, and Civic Education) using a counterbalanced design with a total of four measurements (two in circle and two in rows) in each group. Results of the multilevel modeling analysis indicate more intensive interaction in rows than in circles. However, the findings also indicate significant moderation by the field of study and partially by the extent of facilitator involvement.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***

Abstract-

In the conducted field experiment, we explore the intensity of university students' interaction related to the seating arrangement (circle or rows) in pre-service teachers' groups during the reflective practice. We also probe the differences across the various fields of study and evaluate the facilitator's influence on the interaction. We use wearable electronic Sociometric badges 2.0 to measure the interaction intensity (assessed by speech rate and average speaking segment length). We performed a total of 153 repeated measurements on 58 students in 4 different fields of study (Mathematics, Physics, Music, and Civic Education) using a counterbalanced design with a total of four measurements (two in circle and two in rows) in each group. Results of the multilevel modeling analysis indicate more intensive interaction in rows than in circles. However, the findings also indicate significant moderation by the field of study and partially by the extent of facilitator involvement.







There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Find us on the map

Contact Us

RIE Bhopal
Shyamla Hills
Bhopal
Madhya pradesh - 46003.
E-mail: library.riebpl@gmail.com
Phone: + 91 (0) 755 2522003

Powered by Koha