a

Comparing Student and Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Organic Chemistry Writing-to-Learn Assignments (Record no. 45323)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02758nam a22002057a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20240117155321.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 240116b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
ISSN 0021-9584
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--AUTHOR NAME
Personal name Watts, Field M.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparing Student and Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Organic Chemistry Writing-to-Learn Assignments
Remainder of title (Journal Article)
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication Washington DC
Name of publisher : American Chemical Society
Year of publication , 2023
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Number of Pages 3806–3817p.
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Title Journal of Chemical Society
Volume number/sequential designation , Volume 100: Number 10, October 2023
505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note ***______{For Hard Copy, Please visit Library.}________***<br/><br/>
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Abstract: Chemistry education research demonstrates the value of open-ended writing tasks, such as writing-to-learn (WTL) assignments, for supporting students’ learning with topics including reasoning about reaction mechanisms. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology, such as chatbots ChatGPT and Bard, raises concerns regarding the value of open-ended writing tasks in the classroom; one concern involves academic integrity and whether students will use these chatbots to produce sufficient responses to open-ended writing tasks. The present study investigates the degree to which generative AI chatbots exhibit mechanistic reasoning in response to organic chemistry WTL assignments. We produced responses from three generative AI chatbots (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Bard) to two WTL assignments developed to elicit students’ mechanistic reasoning. Using previously reported machine learning models for analyzing student writing in response to the WTL assignments, we analyzed the chatbot responses for the inclusion of features pertinent to mechanistic reasoning. Herein, we report quantitative analyses of (1) the differences between chatbot responses on the two assignments and (2) the differences between chatbot and authentic student responses. Findings indicate that chatbots respond differently to different WTL assignments. Additionally, the chatbots rarely incorporated the discussion of electron movement, a key feature of mechanistic reasoning. Furthermore, the chatbots, in general, do not engage in mechanistic reasoning at the same level as students. We contextualize the results by considering academic integrity with the assumption that students’ intentions are to engage in academically honest behavior, and we focus on understanding the ethical uses of generative AI for classroom assignments.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical Term Organic Chemistry| Misconceptions/Discrepant Events| Resonance Theory| Chemical Education Research
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Dood, Amber J. | Shultz, Ginger V. | Rodriguez, Jon-Marc G.
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00664
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periodicals
Holdings
Lost status Damaged status Home library Current library Date acquired Koha item type
    RIE BPL Library RIE BPL Library 17.01.2024 Periodicals

Find us on the map

Contact Us

RIE Bhopal
Shyamla Hills
Bhopal
Madhya pradesh - 46003.
E-mail: library.riebpl@gmail.com
Phone: + 91 (0) 755 2522003

Powered by Koha